The idea that rescuing someone might hinder their growth can have some validity in certain contexts:

1. **Dependency:** Constant rescue or intervention might lead individuals to become dependent on others rather than developing their problem-solving skills or resilience.

2. **Learning from Mistakes:** Experiencing and overcoming challenges often fosters personal growth. Constant rescuing might prevent individuals from learning valuable lessons from their mistakes or difficulties.

3. **Building Resilience:** Facing challenges allows individuals to build resilience, adaptability, and coping mechanisms necessary for navigating future obstacles.

4. **Self-Confidence:** Overcoming challenges independently can boost self-confidence and self-efficacy. Constant rescue might hinder the development of confidence in one's abilities.

However, the concept of rescue and growth is nuanced. Support and guidance can be beneficial without necessarily hindering growth. It's about finding a balance between offering help and allowing individuals to face and address challenges on their own, ensuring they have opportunities to learn, develop skills, and grow while also providing a safety net when needed. Ultimately, the manner and timing of assistance play crucial roles in fostering growth without undermining it.

#Rescuebalance #livebeforeyoudie
Avatar of livebefore.youdie

livebefore.youdie

2024-04-08 18:23:01

every time you rescue somebody
you rob them
of the opportunities
every time you step in and you make the problem go away
you make the person
a little weaker
and more dependent on you
so if you truly want somebody to tap into the strength inside themselves
yes there is a time to support people
but if somebody keeps relapsing if somebody keeps forgetting their lunch if somebody keeps
date in the same toxic fuckin person
let them
because eventually
it's not gonna work
and then they're gonna come to you
and ask for help
and when they do
they'll be ready to accept it